Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Categories
Publications

Incident Response and the GDPR (Article)

After (too) many years, I’ve turned the ideas from my original TF-CSIRT documents into a formal academic paper, which has just been published in the open access law journal, SCRIPTed:

Andrew Cormack, “Incident Response: Protecting Individual Rights Under the General Data Protection Regulation”, (2016) 13:3 SCRIPTed 258 https://script-ed.org/?p=3180

The new General Data Protection Regulation provides explicit support for the idea that protecting the security of computers, networks and data is a legitimate interest of organisations. That has recently been confirmed by the European Court of Justice in the Breyer case.

After discussing the need for incident response, the very diverse legal approaches that have been taken to it in the past, and the problems those have created for collaboration, the paper looks at the rules that data protection law applies when processing for a “legitimate interest”. This produces a framework for assessing the impact and benefit of security and incident response activities. Finally there are a series of practical case studies, suggested by various CSIRT teams, analysed against that framework. Reassuringly, the conclusion is that most current CSIRT practice – which is already designed to protect the security of sensitive information – also satisfies the requirements for privacy and data protection.

Thanks to everyone who has, knowingly or not, contributed to the final result.

By Andrew Cormack

I'm Chief Regulatory Advisor at Jisc, responsible for keeping an eye out for places where our ideas, services and products might raise regulatory issues. My aim is to fix either the product or service, or the regulation, before there's a painful bump!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *