Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Categories
Articles

ICO on Safe Harbor judgment

The Information Commissioner’s Office has published a new article on how they are responding to the European Court’s Safe Harbor judgment. The overall message is that data controllers should take stock and not panic. While noting that the judgment does remove some of the former legal certainty, the ICO is “certainly not rushing to use our enforcement powers”.

There’s an important reminder that the actual protection given to personal data isn’t changed by the judgment – “there’s no new and immediate threat”. Companies that gave undertakings under the Safe Harbor principles are still required by their US regulators to stick to those undertakings. That’s particularly relevant in the UK where the Information Commissioner encourages data controllers to make their own assessment of the risk of exports, rather than relying on others’ decisions. Although the ICO is working on updated guidance on how to do that, “for the most part it’s still valid” and the Safe Harbor undertakings can be taken into account.

While the legal position is likely to remain unclear till at least the end of January, when European regulators plan to review progress, it’s good to see our regulator recognising that both data controllers and data subjects are much better served by stability than any sudden changes of direction.

By Andrew Cormack

I'm Chief Regulatory Advisor at Jisc, responsible for keeping an eye out for places where our ideas, services and products might raise regulatory issues. My aim is to fix either the product or service, or the regulation, before there's a painful bump!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *