Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Categories
Articles

Digital Economy Act – Signs of Life

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has published the first draft Statutory Instrument (SI) required for the implementation of the Digital Economy Act’s copyright enforcement process. The Online Infringement of Copyright (Initial Obligations)(Sharing of Costs) Order is is the SI that covers sharing of costs betwen rightsholders and ISPs: as suggested in last summer’s cost sharing consultation rightsholders will have to pay 75% of costs incurred by both ISPs and Ofcom, with ISPs meeting the remaining 25% of both.

There is still no sign of the SI that will contain the initial obligations code specifying the duties of Qualifying ISPs (and possibly identifying which networks will initially fall within that category), or any response to the consultation on the draft code that closed last July.

UPDATE: I hadn’t spotted that the text of the instrument doesn’t address the problem I pointed out in our original consultation response to Q7,  that it gives rightsholders an incentive to under-estimate the number of reports they expect to send. Thanks to Francis Davey, who did spot it, and also considers that making ISPs pay part of the enforcement costs may be unlawful under the European Authorisation Directive (which limits the requirements that Governments can place on those wishing to provide communications services).

By Andrew Cormack

I'm Chief Regulatory Advisor at Jisc, responsible for keeping an eye out for places where our ideas, services and products might raise regulatory issues. My aim is to fix either the product or service, or the regulation, before there's a painful bump!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *